合作邀稿都會註明,若能接受歡迎寫信到這邊喔: wjs02211@gmail.com 謝謝❤ (02211是數字XD)

10822190_10203583648205728_2050494568_n  

剛好看到靠北部落客的爆料

哈哈哈哈所以我也又要來靠北部落客了

當初QQmei很好心教大家如何申請英國學校

在DDC快畢業時還很擔心DDC無法畢業

說DDC壓力很大 做不出畢業作品

結果最後的畢業成果竟然跟芬蘭一家公司的產品很像

連產品名稱都一樣叫RePack!!!!

甚至連介紹產品的句子都差不多

 

芬蘭公司的介紹是

"RePack is an alternative to throwaway consumerism," according to a PDF on the company's former website, www.originalrepack.com. "RePack users simply return their packaging via the local postal system and get an automatic refund on their deposit."
     
DDC的網站介紹的是
 
   "RePack provides an alternative to throwaway consumerism," runs the text on www.yuchangchou.com. "By providing a return and reuse system with innovative RePack bags, RePack users can simply return packaging through their local postal system and get an automatic refund for their deposit."

 

下面留言都說學校應該收回DDC的學位

但因為DDC已經畢業了所以學校目前只是把作品從官網下架

而且DDC會有這靈感是因為QQmei太愛買了哈哈哈

After watching his wife throw out perfectly useable packaging from her online shopping purchases, Yu-Chang Chou was inspired to develop a sustainable alternative, using a similar model to the bottle-return system used in many European countries.

 

總之就像依賢說的

不管是不是抄襲

DDC在設計自己的作品前就應該要做好功課

先查查看有沒有人做過了(連名稱都一樣不難查吧)

就算他真的不知道 也是他的錯 沒有做好研究就出了跟別人一樣的東西

 

DDC在我下面附的第二個連結裡有解釋產品只是很多地方類似

但其實也有很多不同

不過連他自己的學校都把作品下架了

不知DDC現在任職的公司看到這兩則新聞會作何感想

小QQ在爸爸這種示範教育下長大真令人憂心哈哈哈哈哈

(關我屁事)

(我真吃飽太閒)

(不要罵我 我自己罵自己)

#不對的事就是不對

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

以下是新聞網址

http://www.dezeen.com/2014/08/12/royal-college-of-art-graduate-technically-guilty-plagiarism-repack-yu-chang-chou/

News: a former Royal College of Art student has been found "technically" guilty of plagiarism and misconduct after a company complained that his graduate design project was similar to its own services.

The RCA found that Yu-Chang Chou, who graduated from the Innovation Design Engineering (IDE) course earlier this summer, had "presented text created elsewhere as his own", although the college said that this was "absolutely inadvertent".

The course, which is a double master's programme run in collaboration withImperial College London, said it would now review its procedure to prevent similar incidents happening in future.

The RCA ordered an investigation last month after Finnish startup RePackclaimed Chou's graduation project, also called RePack, plagiarised its concept, brand name and descriptive text.

The college has removed the project from its website and advised Chou to likewise remove the work from his site. However, since Chou had already graduated from the college when the plagiarism claim arose, it will take no further action.

"The investigation found that the student has presented some text created elsewhere as his own work," the RCA told Dezeen.

"While we accept that this was absolutely inadvertent, it does technically qualify as academic plagiarism and misconduct. As he is an RCA graduate however, ie no longer an RCA student, there will be no further action taken apart from removing his project from the RCA website, which has already been done."

Chou presented his concept for a reusable postal packaging system at the college's summer show in June. Finnish company RePack complained after seeing the project published on Dezeen.

"We regard all forms of academic misconduct, which includes academic plagiarism, as a serious offence," the college said in a statement. "Students sign up to a code of conduct upon enrolment and we expect them to adhere to this.

"Our investigation has shown that, while Yu-Chang Chou's work is similar to that of the Finnish design company RePack, he developed the product itself independently."

"However, as he has inadvertently presented text created elsewhere as his own, we have taken steps to ensure that the work is no longer available on the RCA website. In addition we have advised that Yu-Chang Chou removes all references to the work from his own website and he has confirmed that this has now been done."

"As a result of the internal investigation, IDE is to review its processes and procedures to ensure that this type of incident does not happen in the future."

The Finnish company said it was expecting a response "along these lines" from the RCA.

"We obviously weren't too pleased to see our product being directly copied by a design student and claiming originality for our work," said RePack's Jonne Hellgren. "However, other designers and students are not our enemies, but disposable packaging is. We and the world would recommend more packaging products based on reusability rather than disposability."

 

第二篇新聞連結

http://www.dezeen.com/2014/07/10/royal-college-of-art-plagiarism-claim-repack/

 

 

Royal College of Art investigates
plagiarism claim

10 July 2014 | 18 comments
More: 

Both versions of RePack

News: the Royal College of Art is investigating claims that one of its graduates plagiarised an existing design after a Finnish company complained that its reusable packaging concept had been copied.

Finnish startup RePack alleges that RCA graduate Yu-Chang Chou copied both its concept and brand name. The company also claims that Chou plagiarised text from its website in his project description.

RePackFinnish startup RePack's design

"Not only has [the] student taken the name of our service, but apparently copied text and concepts detailed on our webpages," RePack's Jonne Hellgren told Dezeen.

"We are contacting the RCA regarding this matter but we also think this kind of behaviour should not be condoned and every action possible to prevent it should be taken," Hellgren added.

Repack packaging by Yu-Chang ChouRCA graduate Yu-Chang Chou's design

Hellgren acted after Chou exhibited a concept for reusable packaging called RePack at Show RCA 2014 last month. The project was subsequently published on Dezeen.

 



 

Founded in 2010, the Finnish startup offers a sustainable packaging solution for online retailers and shoppers. Earlier this year RePack wasnamed one of the winners of Finland's most prestigious design awards, the Fennia Prize.

RePackFinnish startup RePack's design

"RePack is an alternative to throwaway consumerism," according to a PDF on the company's former website, www.originalrepack.com. "RePack users simply return their packaging via the local postal system and get an automatic refund on their deposit."

Hellgren claimed there were strong similarities between that text and text on Chou's website about his graduate project.

Repack packaging by Yu-Chang ChouRCA graduate Yu-Chang Chou's design

"RePack provides an alternative to throwaway consumerism," runs the text on www.yuchangchou.com. "By providing a return and reuse system with innovative RePack bags, RePack users can simply return packaging through their local postal system and get an automatic refund for their deposit."

Both RePack concepts aim to reduce waste by providing special resuable packaging that customers can mail back to the retailer, or use to return unwanted or damaged items.

RePackFinnish startup RePack's design

The Finnish version is already operating via the Finnish postal service while Chou proposes using Royal Mail to operate the service in the UK.

Chou, who graduated from the London institution's Innovation Design Engineering course last month, admitted the concepts were similar but said his idea differed from the Finnish company's in several respects.

Repack-by-Yu-Chang-Chou_dezeen_468_0RCA graduate Yu-Chang Chou's design

"It is true that it is very easy to have misunderstanding about mine and their system just based on watching the video and brief description," Chou told Dezeen. "We both are trying to reduce wastes through reusing the packaging. However the way to sustain the system is different, [and] as a result the stakeholders are different and the packaging design also need to be different."

He added: "As my understanding, their packaging can be customised for retailers based on their needs and the packaging is owned by retailers. The circulation of the packaging is only between retailers and consumers."

RePackFinnish startup RePack adapted their design for army and outdoor store Varusteleka

"In my system, packaging is owned by [the] delivery company and therefore [the] delivery company is able to provide a packaging service for retailers and consumers. The circulation of the packaging is from Royal Mail to retailers to consumers and then back to Royal Mail."

The RCA said it would investigate the claims. "The Royal College of Art takes accusations of plagiarism by our students very seriously," said Professor Miles Pennington, head of the Innovation Design Engineering course. "We will need to investigate the claims further and speak to the graduate concerned before we can make a full statement."

Update 11/07/14: The RCA has issued an additional statement:

“The Royal College of Art takes accusations of student plagiarism seriously and these claims will be investigated. The College has regulations which students are required to adhere to whilst studying at the College, in addition, the Innovation Design Engineering programme requires all students to submit a declaration of originality for their final year projects. The programme expects and trusts students to develop and deliver ideas to the highest standards of originality."

文章標籤
創作者介紹
創作者 黑羊嘿咩叫 的頭像
黑羊嘿咩叫

bittersweet symphony

黑羊嘿咩叫 發表在 痞客邦 留言(4) 人氣()


留言列表 (4)

發表留言
  • 訪客
  • 你可能沒寫過論文
  • 哈哈哈哈哈你的意思是指論文本來就抄來抄去的嗎XD
    我覺得參考是一定會
    但連"產品名稱"都如此雷同
    雷同到連產品介紹都幾乎一模一樣
    雷同到被大雜誌報導出來
    真的挺丟臉的!

    喔還有我寫過論文喔XDD
    只是沒寫完哈哈哈哈哈哈
    因為我太笨了不懂得抄襲哈哈哈哈哈
    加上我研究所念一半就考上正式老師
    為了錢跟五斗米
    還有本身太怠惰
    就沒動力繼續去把研究所念完嗚嗚嗚

    黑羊嘿咩叫 於 2017/09/13 10:41 回覆

  • Wanderlust
  • 這對夫妻暴得大名前我就覺得頗有異樣。事實上我對媽媽部落客都有一定戒心,哈哈哈。
  • 哈哈哈我也是媽媽部落客
    反正網路上的資訊參考就好
    我自己是蠻喜歡QQmei一家人的
    這篇只是就事論事
    都登上國外雜誌被爆雷同了
    當然是研究者DDC的疏忽!

    人沒有完美的~
    他們比較可憐的就是樹大招風
    凡走過必留下痕跡
    疑似抄襲的代價就是會被大肆宣揚
    畢竟越紅大家也就越八卦

    黑羊嘿咩叫 於 2017/09/24 11:29 回覆

  • Wanderlust
  • 我是因為您一篇申論“靠北 霸凌不同”文章來這裡瀏覽, 非常同意“可公評之事“的批評標準。個人對媽媽部落客有戒心單純是個人意見, 成天表演育兒與只講好聽話or朔造夢幻購物生活挺反感。

    反感就切掉不要看,我倒不會去留言謾罵。對於沒見過沒相處過的人,我反對去匿名謾罵或發洩不滿。

    謝謝您剛剛的回覆。
  • 沒錯! 你說得太好了!
    我也是這麼覺得!!
    不喜歡就不要看~
    匿名罵人的酸民最沒種XD
    我支持言論自由
    但也願意對自己的言論負責~

    DDC疑似抄襲的新聞確實是可受公評之事
    有人會護航說天下論文一大抄
    但難道大家都作弊我跟著作弊就是對的了嗎?

    我會選擇把這篇新聞記錄下來
    就是覺得台灣人都是健忘的
    (看看頂新旗下的牛奶現在還不是賣的嚇嚇叫)
    這種人生的汙點既然發生了總要有一些像我這種"無聊分子"紀錄一下哈哈哈
    也提醒名人 人在做天在看
    現在鄉民肉蒐能力這麼強
    真的就是要謹言慎行
    名人出包我碎嘴並不只是八卦
    更不是霸凌!
    說伸張正義太冠冕堂皇
    但至少希望多少能發揮一點警惕的作用!

    黑羊嘿咩叫 於 2017/09/24 13:15 回覆

  • Beverly Chao
  • QQ媽你好:
    我是家裡有了小朋友才開始follow你的分享,我覺得分享的很好,姑且不論什麼商業不商業,對於我們這種不知道什麼品牌比較好用,或是哪種繪本cp值高,非!常!有!用! 我也會多比較,但發現QQ媽分享的,真的是非常棒,而且文章內容很用心,也很詳細。我都覺得,愛碎嘴、愛評論到底是什麼心態,看完分享文,如果不想買就不要買阿,評論別人,會讓自己比較好過嗎? 總之,我非常支持你的分享文(尤其是針對小朋友的商品XD),繼續加油哦!

  • 謝謝你!
    但我是黑羊不是QQmei
    這裡不是QQmei的網誌啦XD

    我也很愛QQ媽
    剛好她是我朋友的國中同學
    她從以前就很認真努力分享生活
    能成為媽媽部落客女王不是沒有道理的!!
    DDC也很棒
    很體貼 對小QQ也是充滿耐心跟愛心的好爸爸

    很高興你也喜歡他們一家人
    不妨多去QQmei的粉絲團幫她按讚鼓勵喔!

    黑羊嘿咩叫 於 2018/01/11 13:34 回覆